propertytalk Live!

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Social Housing Bedroom tax: unfair to tenants and tax payers

Bedroom tax: unfair to tenants and tax payers

User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 

The recent debate in the House of Commons saw the rarely used ‘financial privilege’ rule used to overturn all the Lords amendments to the Welfare Reform Bill. 

This mechanism prevents Peers from overruling MPs on matters of spending.

Responding to the vote National Housing Federation Chief Executive David Orr said:

'The decision by MPs to reject the Lords' Bedroom Tax compromise is a blow to thousands of families in social housing across the country, many of whom are already struggling to make ends meet.

'That over 70 organisations, from disabled charities to mortgage lenders, came together in support of this change to the Welfare Reform Bill shows just how important this issue is. It is unjust to penalise people for under-occupying their homes when they have nowhere else to move to.

'Given the level of opposition in the Lords to these proposals and their potential impact, it is totally wrong for the Government to shut down discussion by claiming financial privilege.

'We will continue to campaign against these unfair proposals.

'While we welcome the Government's commitment to introduce a nine-month grace period for claimants hit by the overall benefit cap after losing their job, we remain concerned that this crude measure will lead to a rise in rent arrears, homelessness and child poverty'.

Graeme Brown, Director of Shelter Scotland said:

“This decision is grossly unfair and shows the UK Government is simply failing to listen to the voice of reason being put forward by housing professionals, social landlords, MSPs and individuals.

“Penalising low-income people for having an extra room assumes that there is a ready supply of smaller properties for them to move to.  This is simply not the case.  So the only consequence will be people stuck in homes with mounting rent arrears and a further descent into debt.

“Even at this late stage, we urge the UK Government to modify its proposals.” 

Have your say on this story using the comment section below

Property Software by Eurolink



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Digg! Del.icio.us! Facebook! MySpace! Reddit! Mixx! Google! Live! Slashdot! Technorati! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Spurl! Furl! Yahoo!

Trackback(0)

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (1)

Subscribe to this comment's feed
(untitled)
These proposals could lead to some severely negative impacts on those most in need. Mobilitiy within social housing is severely restricted because of the lack of stock available. Surely pressure from the Lords as well as numerous organisations from the housing sector, charity and disability sectors is enough to make the government step back and realise what poor judgement these proposals are being made in.
julie@ affordable homes , February 08, 2012 | url

Write comment

smaller | bigger

busy
 

Talkmail™

Sign-up to receive our newsletter.

Powered by MailChimp

Who's Online

We have 181 guests online

Latest Comments

Buckingham Palace ri...
So Windsor Castle is apparently worth less than tw...
London sees shock ri...
I have noticed a significant increase in the numbe...
House prices 86 time...
As well as NIMBYism, several other trends related ...
Rightmove: May housi...
It is certainly interesting to see how the housing...
UK consumers behind ...
We agree with the sentiments expressed in your art...

You can follow us!

  We Love Property on Facebook.com

 Buy propertytalk Live! merchandise at:

We Love Property on Cafepress.com

Advertisement

Featured Links: