Too many people on housing waiting lists (48%), housing market boom and bust (44%), the cost of moving house (37%), and the lack of supply of new homes (35%) were also seen as problems – but each of these was cited by fewer than 50% of respondents, paling by comparison with the perceived plight of young would-be first-time buyers.
Yet consumers appear sceptical about whether the government can make a difference. While 15% thought it likely or very likely that the government could improve first-time buyer affordability over the next five years, 80% thought it unlikely or very unlikely.
Indeed, there was a high degree of scepticism about the likelihood of the government alleviating any of the problems identified. In every case, the proportion of people who felt help was unlikely exceeded the proportion who felt it was likely. However, the balance of opinion was less negative about the likelihood of government addressing energy efficiency (-2%), the size of new homes (-10%), and the prospect of some social tenants transitioning to the private sector (-14%).
Commenting on the findings, CML chief economist Bob Pannell observed:
"The survey found that, on balance, people expressed support for tighter lending criteria. But their high level of concern about would-be first-time buyers sits very uneasily with this. Overall, there is a strong case for saying: be careful what you wish for."
Rosemary Rogers, Director of reallymoving.com said:
“While there are undoubtedly issues that need to be addressed with the UK’s housing market, there is no reason why the cost of moving should be a significant problem when buying a home. In fact, the cost of moving has fallen by approximately a third in the last 10 years because of increased competition and lower overheads for service providers who do business online.
“Unlike 10 years ago, it is easy to compare the cost of removals, surveys, EPCs and conveyancing using the internet".
Have your say on this story using the comment section below