Retail investment to remain robust

Elsewhere, unprofitable shops continue to close and a number of operators remain under threat from tough trading conditions and high levels of debt.
 
Knight Frank research indicates that recent failures of HMV, Jessops and Blockbuster will push national vacancy rates up and put further downward pressure on rental values. However, Knight Frank said it was seeing renewed interest and aggressive bidding for the best stores within these portfolios. It expects to see further polarisation of both high streets and shopping centres between the regionally dominant and sub-prime locations.
 
In the investment market, investors have continued to target prime locations with solid tenant line-ups and areas with under-supply. This year has got off to a robust start in the shopping centre investment market, with numerous exchanges and likely completions in the coming weeks. Investor appetite is expected to remain robust for prime shopping centres and leisure, while sentiment for good secondary stock with asset management opportunities is improving.
 
Bruce Nutman, partner, head of retail investment at Knight Frank said: "Despite the continued problems on the high street, retail and leisure is currently an actively sought product by investors. Market pricing allows investors to choose their risk profile and we are noticing a slightly increased availability of debt. We expect 2013 to be an active trading year within the shopping centre sector and above 2012 levels."
 
Andrew McGregor, partner, head of Leisure and out of town at Knight Frank said: "The purchase of standing investment stock had been the domain of the UK Funds / institutions for a number of years, but the latter part of 2012, and into 2013 has seen a return of the REITS. We expect this to continue into 2013. Most of the REITS, given their development exposure, have a pressing need to generate safe and secure income to prop up dividend payments to shareholders.
 
"Whether income in this sector can be regarded as ‘safe and secure’ is debatable, but as ever, it all depends upon good stock picking. The high profile tenant failures of Comet, JJB Sports and Peacocks have to some extent moved investors down the ‘risk curve’, therefore creating a premium market for the better schemes and conversely, a discount market (or no market) for perceived secondary assets. Hence, while an investor may be prepared to take an element of covenant risk, the asset needs to be at a market rent and /or be in the right location to attract alternative tenant demand."

Have your say on this story using the comment section below