propertytalk Live!

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Buy-to-Let Landlords back stronger buy-to-let mortgage regulation

Landlords back stronger buy-to-let mortgage regulation

User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 

The majority of landlords support stronger regulation of buy-to-let mortgages and advice, according to a survey conducted by LSL Property Services.

But not all landlords are the same, so the Treasury and FSA must resist the temptation to impose "one size fits all" regulation, David Brown, LSL Commercial Director, warned.

Nearly 60% of landlords favour proposals to regulate buy-to-let mortgage lending, believing it will provide additional protection for landlords raising finance. Landlords are also in favour of regulating advice provided by intermediaries and introducers in respect of buy-to-let loans, with 59% saying it will help root out unscrupulous introducers and intermediaries.

Brown said: "It may be surprising that many landlords advocate further regulation - but this does reflect a general desire for additional investor protection, and if it leads to a greater professionalisation of the sector, it should be applauded." 

But while they support regulation to protect the inexperienced, 55% of landlords with seven or more years’ experience are opposed to the regulation of mortgage products, arguing that they don’t need the additional administrative burden.

Brown said: "The majority of experienced property investors do not necessarily need nor want the added protection or burden of increased regulation. Most are able to secure their own finance and are skilful at managing brokers and lenders to obtain the products they need. Long established portfolio landlords are less likely to benefit from tighter regulation. Indeed, they see a real risk that disproportionate regulation may force more lenders and brokers from the sector, exacerbating the current shortage of buy-to-let mortgage finance.

"Increased regulation would potentially help less experienced landlords, but it needs to be simple and proportionate. The FSA and the Treasury should avoid using a sledge-hammer to crack a nut. Landlords have different levels of experience, and different requirements. With a one size fits all approach to regulation, any benefit for inexperienced investors could potentially be outweighed by the damage to the sector if it ended up making it less attractive for larger scale landlords to invest."

Have your say on this story using the comment section below

Property Software by Eurolink



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Digg! Del.icio.us! Facebook! MySpace! Reddit! Mixx! Google! Live! Slashdot! Technorati! StumbleUpon! MySpace! Spurl! Furl! Yahoo!

Trackback(0)

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Write comment

smaller | bigger

busy
 

Talkmail™

Sign-up to receive our newsletter.

Powered by MailChimp

Who's Online

We have 167 guests online

Latest Comments

Buckingham Palace ri...
So Windsor Castle is apparently worth less than tw...
London sees shock ri...
I have noticed a significant increase in the numbe...
House prices 86 time...
As well as NIMBYism, several other trends related ...
Rightmove: May housi...
It is certainly interesting to see how the housing...
UK consumers behind ...
We agree with the sentiments expressed in your art...

You can follow us!

  We Love Property on Facebook.com

 Buy propertytalk Live! merchandise at:

We Love Property on Cafepress.com

Advertisement

Featured Links: